Paper News in a Digital Age: From Mass Media to Personalized Media September 3
Last week’s post, “Paper News in a Digital Age,” has officially garnered more responses than any other post I’ve written here. Since one of GrowSmart Maine’s roles is to function as a statewide incubator for civic engagement and interaction (and newspapers are an invaluable part of fostering those statewide discussions) I’d like to continue this conversation and invite more reporters, writers, and publishers to chime in with comments or guest posts. I’ve also enabled anonymous comments for anyone who doesn’t care to be identified, but comments will still be moderated for appropriateness.
Now, as someone who blogs, freelances for print publications, and cares deeply - on a personal and professional level - about the future of our newspapers, here are my own personal ideas about how to improve newspapers’ business models (and I hope that you’ll improve on these ideas by leaving your comments):
Unlike some other commentators, I have my doubts about the so-called “death” of print journalism. A printed newspaper is the only practical way to read the news on a bus, or a park bench, or in a diner. And most people would rather read from a printed page than strain their eyes by looking at a backlit screen.
However, I must confess that it’s been weeks since the last time I bought a copy of the Portland Press Herald. Since that paper began its layoffs in the newsroom, there are usually only two or three articles a day that interest me, and they’re usually pretty short. Instead of going out, paying 60 cents, and flipping through the pages in search of those articles, I can go online and locate their headlines in a few seconds. A lot of other people take the same approach, which leads to declining print circulation.
As circulation declines, the paper has responded by shrinking the size of the printed edition, excising wire reports, and trimming other elements of the printed paper. Some of these moves are savvy: no one is crying about the loss of microscopic stock prices from last night’s closing bell. But the cumulative loss of content does real damage to the customers’ sense of value. This is the paradox of mass media: with such a diverse audience, every part of the newspaper - even stock quotes - is “popular” to some people. Cut away enough “unpopular” elements that only appeal to a small niche of your readership, and eventually you’ll end up alienating the majority of your audience.
Here’s my proposed solution, then. Newspapers should behave less like mass-media outlets, broadcasting the same product to all of its readers and subscribers, and more like Internet portals like Yahoo! or Google, which broadcast a more specialized product to targeted customers.
In spite of the Press Herald’s weight loss and the cost of newsprint, I’m astounded at how much paper people throw away without reading it. I always toss the sports and lifestyles sections, because I couldn’t care less about box scores, “Dear Abby,” or high school tournaments. So when I buy a paper, half of the Press Herald’s expenses, and its advertisers’ expenses, are wasted on a customer like me.
And most readers are like me: they throw away half of the newspaper without reading it. Some ignore the opinion pages; others ignore the business section; still others ignore everything but the crossword puzzle.
But what if I could subscribe to only the parts of the Portland Press Herald that interested me? The PPH could save money by using less newsprint. I could save time and hassle by not mucking around with extraneous newspaper sections. And, taking a cue from Google’s extremely successful Adwords program, advertisers could gain value by targeting their ads to specific audiences.
And so, for instance, instead of putting the same daily edition of the Portland Press Herald in newsstands and front porches, every single subscriber would be able to customize their daily paper by choosing from a menu of columns, news topics, and features. And newsstands might begin selling three or four editions of the daily paper, instead of only one: a “sports fan” edition with two pages of news and twelve pages of sports, a “politics junkie” edition with twelve pages of news and two pages of sports, and so on.
This is basically the model of RSS subscriptions, which allow Internet users to create a constantly-updated “a la carte” newspaper cobbled together from various blogs and newspaper sites. By using an RSS reader, you can have a daily update delivered from any blog or news site that publishes a syndicated feed. Here’s a sample RSS subscription that combines headlines from local blogs with international energy news for a hypothetical Maine-based oil baron.
RSS is nifty, but I see two ways that traditional newspapers could do better. First, they could provide this same content in paper form, which would be easier to read. Second, newspapers could provide more locally-targeted advertising for RSS content. It’s difficult for a Google Adwords advertiser to target a specific city or town, but that’s a specialty of printed newspapers.
The RSS model could also allow writers - from national columnists, to freelancers, to local “citizen journalists” - to syndicate their work in print or on newspaper websites in exchange for a cut of ad revenue. This, in turn, would restore and bolster a lot of the content that’s been cut from newspapers in recent years, and add additional value for a newspaper’s readers.
There are limits to how much a print newspaper can be customized, and I strongly believe that a lot of newspapers’ social value comes from exposing a mass audience to news, stories, and viewpoints that they wouldn’t typically be interested in. I may not ever read the sports section, but I’d still want to see the Red Sox on the front page of my newspaper if they win the World Series. The editors’ role should be as a professional news filter, determining what stories everyone should know about, and what stories would most appeal to, or expand the horizons of, a specific audience.
Newspapers should enhance, not divide, the common civic experience. But by restoring interest in newspapers, boosting circulation, and increasing ad revenue, a customized newspaper should have more resources to do exactly that.

Paul Sep 3
While I like your suggestions, I essentially see them as trying to duplicate the internet’s flexibility in print form. That ability of digital is hard to duplicate in analog.
Creating/printing multiple versions of a newspaper seems like it has the potential to cause more financial hardship, at least initially, than most print outlets are willing to risk. If you look at other print publications, how many others have you seen that create multiple versions, disregarding those created for other countries? Most of what I can recall are clever covers, which are printed separately. The cost of creating and assembling multiple versions, while also not knowing how each would sell on a daily basis (ex: Sports version selling really well if Boston wins), seems much higher. When income is falling, few will take any substantial financial risks.
Instead, being a technology junkie, I really feel that digital is the solution. Probably the sentence I disagree with most in your entry is this: “And most people would rather read from a printed page than strain their eyes by looking at a backlit screen.”
If you examine the sales and reviews of Amazon’s Kindle, it is doing extremely well. It is not perfect, but no first step is. E-paper has the potential to revolutionize the entire newspaper/media/news business, as well as other areas (”http://edupaper.nl/inhoud/welcome”). When I was waiting for my ride after two weeks on the PCT the first thing I did was turn on my high resolution iPhone and read the NY Times. Also checked my RSS subscriptions for various pieces of news. I see people doing this on the train and bus constantly.
Imagine a textured piece of plastic that is flexible and can download any newspaper from any location. Just like an internet portal you can customize your settings for what is shown; news, sports, stocks, whatever. With a special pen you can turn on highlighting, take notes, and even do the crossroads. And depending on what news/data you want, you only have to download and/or pay so much per month. My feeling is that right now we are in a bit of a rough transition for media outlets until the technology is widespread and well developed enough for wide spread use.
I think newspapers in actual paper form will be around for a while yet, but I foresee a future where our information is almost entirely gotten digitally. My hope is that most media companies, local and national, will start preparing for it now.
Christian Sep 4
Thanks for the comment, Paul. I agree that e-paper is the future - a hybrid of the portability and tactile qualities of printed paper with the power and flexibility of digital media.
But that’s still years away. Even in the depths of Silicon Valley, you’re still a hundred times more likely to see a Stephen King paperback than a Kindle in any given coffee shop: the vast majority of people still prefer to read their news and books in print. In the meantime, before e-paper takes off, newspapers are facing down bankruptcy right now, newsrooms are dealing with layoffs.
A lot of people my age, who are comfortable working on the Internet and usually make their career of it (as Paul did - he’s a 29-year-old retired software CTO), think that the Press Herald should just sell off the printing presses and go entirely online. But abandoning print and going all-digital right now would also take a lot of new capital investment, and - especially in a place like Maine, with lots of readers who are elderly or don’t have access to wireless networks - it would also abandon a big part of the audience.
So while we wait for the ubiquitous i-pod of e-paper that’s easy enough for the grandparents to use, how can we adapt analog paper to survive and preserve the valuable social capital that journalists provide?
Justin Sep 4
I have taken the torch and run with it over at NXT. Let’s hope something good develops.
amy Sep 4
I would like to see online be the source of breaking news, blogs, multimedia projects and interesting ways for the community to connect - databases of reporter compiled information, community message boards, niche areas targeting special audiences (like a pets section that has an actual dedicated staff person managing), etc.
I would like to see print be long form, expanded versions of stories that premiere online. More investigative stories, reporter projects, even magazine topics (think Sunday New York times). Its fine for that content to appear on online too, but I am on the computer all day long and I truly prefer to read anything longer than a page in the printed format. (Maybe that will transition to handheld someday, but it’ll never be a full computer screen).
Also, as a side note…..for online…..I love seeing comments on blogs and reading letters to the editor and would love seeing bulletin boards for people that want to discuss local news to visit. I do not, however, see any use in the PPH letting readers comment on stories. It has proven to be an outlet for ignorant and racist people to spew their hate and rarely adds anything to the actual story. I particularly dislike the PPH providing links to the top commented on stories where the link takes you straight to comments not the story. I would guess the commenter crowd never even reads most of the stories on which they post. Comments have a place - blogs, discussion threads, etc just not on the news.